A question is dispatched to six agents. Each returns a typed verdict with a calibrated confidence. The six estimates are pooled in log-odds into a single probability of 0.86, where a plain average of the same votes would have given 0.62. Against an autonomy threshold of 0.75, the committee resolves to ACT.
A decision arrives in your software. Not a prompt — a question with an answer you have to act on.
pool 0.86 > line 0.75
average 0.62 would have escalated
Introducing the committee ···· decisions beyond chat
Six agents, each primed to care about something different, return typed verdicts with calibrated confidence. Their votes are pooled in log-odds into one decision your software can branch on.
The same six members, the same pooling, running on whatever you type. Drag the windows by their title bars. Move the trip setting and watch the verdict change its mind about whether it needs you.
Strongest case for acting
Strongest case against
Downside exposure and tail events
Resource, time and money cost
What happened the last N times
Aggregates, breaks ties, owns the output
{ "verdict": "ABSTAIN",
"p": 0.500,
"action": "ESCALATE" }Not one opinion
Ask one model the same question twice and you get one opinion twice. Its errors are perfectly correlated with themselves, so more sampling buys you nothing but confidence in the same mistake.
Engineered dissent
Our members are primed to optimise for different things — upside, downside, cost, precedent. When they agree, that agreement is worth something. When they split, the committee escalates instead of guessing.
Decisions, Not Strings
Typed outputs your software can act on.
Calibrated By Vote
Six independent estimates, weighted into one probability.
Disagreement Is Signal
A split committee escalates instead of guessing.
6
Independent perspectives per decision.
1
Typed output your code can branch on.
Committee Log
A single model asked twice gives you one opinion twice. Disagreement has to come from somewhere.
Read more
Method
Why the aggregating agent carries 1.5x, and what breaks when it carries more.
Read more
Method
The most valuable output of a committee is the honest admission that it is split.
Read more
Six agents, each primed with a different prior — advocate, skeptic, risk, cost, precedent, chair. Each returns a typed vote with a calibrated confidence. The votes are weighted and combined into one decision.